
Send us your thoughts on the show, the guests, the topics, and more to programming@aztv.com!
Regarding the 2/14 show:
Religion vs the Constitution
There is a more
than apparent and perennial conflict between religion and our Constitution that
often boils down into whether or not we are a Christian nation. This conflict
has driven both sides apart and behind bunkers with a huge swath of no-man's
land in the middle.
Yet the solution is simple and readily available to
both sides. For Christians, Christ is in our hearts as much as is the
Constitution and both point to a common remedy. If there is a practice, a
behavior, a morality that is not unlawful, you are free to follow it. There is
only one restriction on this gift. We cannot to force it on others.
Both
Christ and the Constitution are in agreement with this point. While this
compromise does not prevent one side from presenting a persuasive argument
(proselytizing) to the other, it does prevent one side from forcing adherence to
it's morality on the other. That is against both Christ's teachings and the
U.S. Constitution.
Contraception is an excellent example. The instant
fight is over whether the government can force insurance companies to provide
contraception to all their insureds without regard for belief. It is not, as
formerly put, to force people to pay for something that is against their
beliefs. That was a mistake in presentation. All the government was intending
to do was to ensure contraception is available to all who wish to use it, which
is its job.
Just because it is available does not mean an individual who
believes contraception is wrong has to use it. Nor does it mean that those who
believe contraception is wrong are able to force that belief on others who
believe otherwise. It's called tolerance and the purpose of government is to
protect us from ourselves.
Edward A. Tomchin
Golden
Valley, AZ